Skip to main content

Stunning New Trend: University Tutors Develop Telepathic Abilities to Accuse Students of AI Usage Based on Gut Instinct

In a groundbreaking revelation that has left the academic world reeling, university tutors have begun harnessing supernatural powers to detect AI usage among students with precision previously thought only possible in sci-fi films. This trend has ignited a fierce debate on campuses as confused students scratch their heads and hardworking learners dodge metaphorical bullets.

Our story begins with Albert—a 19-year-old undergraduate English major who totally doesn’t want you to know his real name—receiving an ominous email from the all-seeing, all-knowing university code of conduct team. With a dramatic gasp, Albert read the terrifying accusation: he had allegedly used artificial intelligence to craft his latest essay. Should he fail to attend a hearing or make his case, an automatic fail would greet him at the finish line. The kicker? Albert insists he didn’t cheat. Apparently, writing like you swallowed a thesaurus is now suspicious.

Albert, who vehemently claims to have authored the essay himself, found himself entrenched in disbelief. “Sure, it wasn’t the Pulitzer Prize winner of essays, but I busted my ass on that piece,” he told our reporter while sipping a latte and staring into the existential void. “Being accused because I used fancy words like ‘in addition to’ and ‘in contrast’—it was like someone slapped me in the face with my own righteous indignation.”

Indeed, Albert’s story is not an isolated incident in the current landscape of academia. Institutions across the globe are battling this malevolent AI specter, although some skeptics might wonder if it’s really a ploy for underpaid professors to finally have their ‘Gotcha!’ moment.

Meanwhile, the secretive cabal of university tutors, who are clearly moonlighting as tech-savvy clairvoyants, continue their crusade against any semblance of processed excellence. “I could just feel it,” explained one tutor, donning a cape just for the dramatic effect. “That ‘signpost phrase’ screamed AI to me. You don’t learn that kind of vernacular unless you’re up to something.”

Ironically, Albert, who claims his only crime was a lapse in creativity, now faces the looming horror of repeating an entire academic year. It seems the universe has a hilarious way of rewarding mediocre performance with an assumption of AI dependency.

As these accusations of AI use ricochet through academic halls, the question remains: Could it be that the real threat isn’t generative AI, but rather a system that has gloriously lost its marble in verifying honest human effort?

Stay tuned as our intrepid student reporter investigates the next logical step in this saga—AI co-writing apology emails to emotionally distressed students madly searching for justice.