# MICKEY MOUSE SUES MIDJOURNEY FOR FORCING HIM TO APPEAR IN UNAUTHORIZED ORGIES WITH SHREK
Hollywood’s biggest stars are reportedly “f#cking furious” after discovering AI-generated images of themselves engaged in activities ranging from “mildly embarrassing” to “constitutionally protected but morally questionable” across the internet.
DISNEY EXECS DISCOVER WHAT RULE 34 MEANS
In a lawsuit filed yesterday that has legal experts calling it “the copyright showdown of the century,” Disney, Universal, and other major studios are suing AI image generator Midjourney for allegedly creating a “massive engine for turning beloved childhood characters into depraved content that would make Walt Disney cryogenically spin in his frozen chamber.”
The case includes dozens of exhibits showing side-by-side comparisons of iconic characters like Yoda, Spider-Man, and Minions alongside their AI-generated counterparts doing everything from mundane activities to what one Disney lawyer described as “things that would make even the most degenerate internet dweller blush.”
“Piracy is piracy,” said Disney’s legal counsel Bernard Tightpurse. “Whether it’s downloading a movie illegally or creating an image of Mickey Mouse participating in a cross-universe gangbang with the Minions, it’s all theft of intellectual property.”
EXPERTS AGREE THIS IS TOTALLY BULLS#IT
“What we’re seeing here is the death throes of outdated copyright laws colliding with unstoppable technological progress,” explained Dr. Penny Loafer, professor of Digital Ethics at University of Common Sense. “These companies are essentially arguing they own the concept of a mouse standing upright. It’s like claiming you own the letter ‘E’ and suing anyone who uses it.”
According to a completely fabricated survey we just made up, 87% of Americans couldn’t give less of a sh!t about copyright laws when it comes to AI-generated images, with 92% admitting they’ve specifically searched for their favorite characters in “compromising scenarios.”
SILICON VALLEY RESPONDS: “FAIR USE, FAIR SCHMUSE”
Midjourney CEO David Holz responded to the lawsuit with what sources describe as “nervous laughter” followed by “frantic calls to every lawyer in California.”
Industry insiders suggest the AI company’s defense will rely heavily on the concept of “fair use,” which allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.
“Fair use is the digital equivalent of saying ‘I’m not touching you’ while holding your finger an inch from someone’s face,” explained tech analyst Trevor Datapoint. “It’s technically correct but incredibly annoying to the other party.”
THE REAL VICTIMS: PEOPLE WHO PAID FOR AI PORN
The lawsuit has sent shockwaves through the community of people who have been paying subscription fees to generate images of fictional characters engaged in activities their creators never intended.
“I’ve spent over $500 generating hyper-realistic images of Shrek and Donkey in various historical settings,” lamented Reddit user DreamworksDreamer69. “If they take this away from me, what am I supposed to do with my weekends? Talk to real people?”
According to absolutely no research whatsoever, approximately 78% of all AI image requests involve either nudity, violence, or combining characters from different intellectual properties – all of which could potentially violate copyright laws.
THE FUTURE OF CREATIVITY IS AT STAKE (OR MAYBE JUST WEIRD PORN)
Legal experts predict the case could have far-reaching implications for the entire AI industry, potentially forcing companies to implement stricter content filters or pay massive licensing fees to copyright holders.
“This is about more than just preventing Spider-Man from appearing in unauthorized crossovers with Batman,” said industry analyst Sarah Circuitboard. “It’s about determining whether AI can learn from existing art and culture without being considered a giant copyright-infringing monster.”
As the case progresses, one thing remains clear: the line between inspiration and infringement has never been blurrier, and Mickey Mouse has never appeared in more inappropriate situations than he has in the past year.
When reached for comment, a Disney spokesperson simply sighed and said, “Look, we just don’t want our mouse doing things that would make even Goofy say ‘Garsh, that’s f@cking disturbing.'”
